According to approaches like this, epistemology sought to highlight the rational, objective and systematic aspect of science and the method us in its context. The research work develop by scientists and their contributions to knowlge were fundamentally defin by of Their Own what was call “justification context”, that is, the structure of a theory, its adjustment and verification were defin through procures. logical and strict verification operations that ultimately referr scientific concepts to the plane of experience. But in the course of development of this type of research, philosophers have also stood out who,
Ict and Adapting This
On the opposite shore, have deni that the scientific enterprise is a process in which the progressive accumulation of knowlge can be seen, as thomas kuhn maintain. Or there has been the case of those others who, like the austrian paul feyerabend, have flatly reject the business database possibility that science is objective, rational and systematic knowlge. Feyerabend maintain that the scientist is an opportunist who does not follow a single structure of steps when doing science, but rather resorts to the most diverse procures and strategies to carry out his research.
Use in the Ucational Curriculum
With this, and in radical opposition to what was propos by the Vienna Circle, Feyerabend privileg the so-call “context of discovery”, that is, the determining weight that the idiosyncratic aspects of the researcher have in the field of research and scientific discoveries, of Their Own the peculiar features of a certain historical era and the innovative EF Leads opportunism with which the scientist violates, almost always blatantly, the rigid catalog of steps that would supposly make up the scientific method. Feyerabend maintain, in addition to this, that Western science was simply a way of explaining reality, so alongside it it should,